<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Answering the Facebook Platform Bears- #1: &#8220;Facebook apps are not real media&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://blog.sethgoldstein.com/2007/10/18/answering-the-facebook-platform-bears-1-facebook-apps-are-not-real-media/</link>
	<description>Transparent Bundles- from Wall Street to the Web</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rafer</title>
		<link>http://blog.sethgoldstein.com/2007/10/18/answering-the-facebook-platform-bears-1-facebook-apps-are-not-real-media/#comment-304</link>
		<author>Scott Rafer</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 17:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.sethgoldstein.com/2007/10/18/answering-the-facebook-platform-bears-1-facebook-apps-are-not-real-media/#comment-304</guid>
		<description>I'm obviously a believer, but not in the same way. 

The user acquisition onto apps clearly has value but may not on Facebook itself. As with so many mechanisms in the direct marketing world, Facebook and similar platforms may be the lead generation mechanism but not the place to also make money on those leads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m obviously a believer, but not in the same way. </p>
<p>The user acquisition onto apps clearly has value but may not on Facebook itself. As with so many mechanisms in the direct marketing world, Facebook and similar platforms may be the lead generation mechanism but not the place to also make money on those leads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
